Screener
HARD vs TUA
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- TUA costs 0.53% less per year.
- TUA is significantly larger than HARD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while TUA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HARD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $802M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and TUA
Explore further