Screener
HARD vs CTA
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CTA is significantly larger than HARD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HARD is classified as commodity, while CTA is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.20% | 19.72% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -18.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and CTA
Explore further