Screener
HARD vs USG
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund
Key differences
HARD is a commodity ETF, while USG is an alternative ETF. HARD charges 0.78% a year and USG 0.45%.
- HARD is a commodity fund, while USG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- USG costs 0.33% less per year.
- HARD is much larger than USG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, USG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | USG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $114M | $12M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.40% | 26.20% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.9% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.58% | 23.47% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -18.45% |
Similar to HARD and USG
Explore further