Screener
HARD vs DCMT
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
Key differences
- DCMT costs 0.12% less per year.
- HARD is significantly larger than DCMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HARD | DCMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $38M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | 2.69% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.36% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -13.51% | -11.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HARD and DCMT
Explore further