Screener
HAUZ vs EFA
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- HAUZ costs 0.22% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than HAUZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAUZ | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2013 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 15.16% |
| Max drawdown | -39.51% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAUZ and EFA
Explore further