Screener
HAUZ vs XEML
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF vs Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF
Key differences
- HAUZ costs 0.25% less per year.
- HAUZ is significantly larger than XEML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAUZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAUZ | XEML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $5M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.51% | -13.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAUZ and XEML
Explore further