Screener
XEML vs DBEZ
Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
- XEML costs 0.10% less per year.
- DBEZ is significantly larger than XEML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DBEZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XEML | DBEZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $70M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.68% |
| Max drawdown | -13.49% | -38.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XEML and DBEZ
Explore further