Screener
HAUZ vs XRLX
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- HAUZ costs 1.10% less per year.
- HAUZ is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAUZ is classified as equity, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- HAUZ follows a index tracking strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAUZ | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $51M |
| Since | 2013 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 4.34% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.5% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 8.13% |
| Max drawdown | -39.51% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAUZ and XRLX
Explore further