Screener
HCMT vs QQH
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- QQH costs 0.20% less per year.
- HCMT is classified as equity, while QQH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HCMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; QQH uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCMT | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.18% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $551M | $697M |
| Since | 2023 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.51% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCMT and QQH
Explore further