Screener
QQH vs LGH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
Key differences
- QQH follows a active selection strategy; LGH uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QQH | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $697M | $555M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.9% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.79% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -41.87% | -29.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QQH and LGH
Explore further