Screener
HCMT vs TUGN
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.53% less per year.
- HCMT is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HCMT is classified as equity, while TUGN is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- HCMT follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUGN uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| HCMT | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.18% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $551M | $78M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.43% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.3% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.51% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HCMT and TUGN
Explore further