Screener
HDEF vs ADIV
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- HDEF costs 0.69% less per year.
- HDEF is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HDEF follows a index tracking strategy; ADIV uses active selection.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HDEF | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $55M |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.54% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.60% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -36.43% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HDEF and ADIV
Explore further