Screener
HEAL vs KRMA
Global X HealthTech ETF vs Global X Conscious Companies ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.07% less per year.
- KRMA is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEAL | KRMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25M | $116M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | 2.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -20.2% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -10.3% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.0% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 12.35% |
| Max drawdown | -65.76% | -36.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEAL and KRMA
Explore further