Screener
KRMA vs AGNG
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Global X Aging Population ETF
Key differences
- KRMA costs 0.07% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KRMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KRMA | AGNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $82M |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.46% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.35% | 13.52% |
| Max drawdown | -36.16% | -30.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KRMA and AGNG
Explore further