Screener
HECO vs IGF
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
HECO is an alternative ETF, while IGF is an equity ETF. HECO charges 0.90% a year and IGF 0.39%.
- HECO is an alternative fund, while IGF is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- HECO follows a option income strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- HECO covers North America; IGF covers global markets.
- IGF costs 0.51% less per year.
- IGF is much larger than HECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HECO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $10.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.97% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.9% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.71% | 10.52% |
| Max drawdown | -43.74% | -42.11% |
Similar to HECO and IGF
Explore further