Screener
HECO vs IWM
State Street Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
HECO is an alternative ETF, while IWM is an equity ETF. HECO charges 0.90% a year and IWM 0.19%.
- HECO is an alternative fund, while IWM is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- HECO follows a option income strategy; IWM uses index tracking.
- IWM costs 0.71% less per year.
- IWM is much larger than HECO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HECO | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $116M | $80.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +117.9% | +36.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.71% | 19.54% |
| Max drawdown | -43.74% | -41.13% |
Similar to HECO and IWM
Explore further