Screener
IWM vs IWL
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWM is significantly larger than IWL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and IWL
Explore further