Screener
HEQT vs IWL
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.28% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than HEQT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HEQT is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HEQT follows a option income strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HEQT | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $321M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.47% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -11.51% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HEQT and IWL
Explore further