Screener
IWL vs SHUS
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.64% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than SHUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWL is classified as equity, while SHUS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWL follows a index tracking strategy; SHUS uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | SHUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $24M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 10.16% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -14.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and SHUS
Explore further