Screener
HERO vs RING
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.11% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than HERO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HERO | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2019 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.1% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.6% | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.61% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -54.02% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HERO and RING
Explore further