Screener
RING vs AUMI
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs Themes Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | AUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $30M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +65.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.82% | 47.96% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -31.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and AUMI
Explore further