Screener
HFGM vs CGGO
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.54% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than HFGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while CGGO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 16.59% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and CGGO
Explore further