Screener
HFGM vs CGIE
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Capital Group International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIE costs 0.47% less per year.
- CGIE is significantly larger than HFGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while CGIE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; CGIE uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | CGIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 16.12% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -13.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and CGIE
Explore further