Screener
HFGM vs MAPP
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
Key differences
- MAPP costs 0.21% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than MAPP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while MAPP is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; MAPP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | MAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 2.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 8.97% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -12.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and MAPP
Explore further