Screener
HFGM vs OSEA
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.46% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than HFGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGM is classified as alternative, while OSEA is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $133M | $497M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.05% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.77% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -10.66% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGM and OSEA
Explore further