Screener
HFGM vs XNAV
Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both HFGM and XNAV are alternative ETFs. HFGM charges 1.01% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- HFGM follows a tactical allocation strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- HFGM costs 0.26% less per year.
- HFGM is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGM | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $34M |
| Since | 2025 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 5.06% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.89% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -10.97% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.