Screener
HFGO vs ROSC
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- ROSC costs 0.25% less per year.
- HFGO is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFGO follows a active selection strategy; ROSC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HFGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFGO | ROSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $181M | $55M |
| Since | 2021 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.94% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -44.64% | -43.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFGO and ROSC
Explore further