Screener
HFND vs AGOX
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- HFND costs 0.26% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than HFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; AGOX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AGOX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | AGOX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $364M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 18.38% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -27.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and AGOX
Explore further