Screener
HFND vs AMAX
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- HFND costs 0.29% less per year.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $60M |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and AMAX
Explore further