Screener
HGRO vs IDHQ
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
- IDHQ costs 0.41% less per year.
- IDHQ is significantly larger than HGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HGRO covers north america markets; IDHQ covers global.
- HGRO follows a active selection strategy; IDHQ uses index tracking.
- IDHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HGRO | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $741M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -7.61% | -33.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HGRO and IDHQ
Explore further