Screener
IDHQ vs XMHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ is significantly larger than IDHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IDHQ covers global markets; XMHQ covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IDHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IDHQ | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $741M | $5.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +12.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.83 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.42% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -33.87% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IDHQ and XMHQ
Explore further