Screener
HIBL vs CHAU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.21% less per year.
- HIBL covers north america markets; CHAU covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIBL | CHAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $104M |
| Since | 2019 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +282.3% | +73.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +63.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 66.50% | 33.23% |
| Max drawdown | -88.27% | -78.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIBL and CHAU
Explore further