Screener
HIBL vs YINN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.36% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than HIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIBL is classified as equity, while YINN is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIBL | YINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 1.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $766M |
| Since | 2019 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +282.3% | -19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +63.1% | -5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.4% | -37.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 66.50% | 58.22% |
| Max drawdown | -88.27% | -98.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIBL and YINN
Explore further