Screener
YINN vs HIBS
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBS costs 0.28% less per year.
- YINN is significantly larger than HIBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- YINN is classified as cryptocurrency, while HIBS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- YINN follows a leveraged strategy; HIBS uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, YINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YINN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| YINN | HIBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.34% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $766M | $19M |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 7.92% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.0% | -82.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | -5.5% | -63.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -37.5% | -53.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | -0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.22% | 67.94% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to YINN and HIBS
Explore further