Screener
HIBS vs TZA
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.07% less per year.
- TZA is significantly larger than HIBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIBS | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.06% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $270M |
| Since | 2019 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 7.92% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -80.6% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -62.8% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -52.3% | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.97 | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 67.54% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -99.98% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIBS and TZA
Explore further