Screener
TZA vs SPXS
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.05% less per year.
- TZA follows a inverse strategy; SPXS uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TZA | SPXS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $270M | $388M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 4.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -67.4% | -50.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | -43.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -30.9% | -35.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.70 | -1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.16% | 36.05% |
| Max drawdown | -99.70% | -99.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TZA and SPXS
Explore further