Screener
HIMU vs MEAR
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.13% less per year.
- HIMU follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 5.16% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.92% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIMU and MEAR
Explore further