Screener
MEAR vs NEAR
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- NEAR is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, NEAR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $4.3B |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEAR and NEAR
Explore further