Screener
HIMU vs MUB
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- MUB costs 0.34% less per year.
- MUB is significantly larger than HIMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | MUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $43.7B |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.16% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.92% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -13.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIMU and MUB
Explore further