Screener
HIMU vs SUB
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.32% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than HIMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | SUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $11.1B |
| Since | 2006 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 5.16% | 2.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +3.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.92% | 1.00% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -9.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIMU and SUB
Explore further