Screener
HIMU vs SHYG
iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SHYG costs 0.09% less per year.
- SHYG is significantly larger than HIMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HIMU | SHYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $7.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.16% | 7.01% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.92% | 3.20% |
| Max drawdown | -8.01% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HIMU and SHYG
Explore further