Screener
HISF vs LMBS
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- LMBS costs 0.17% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than HISF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HISF | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.83% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.94% | 4.09% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.1% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.36% | 1.96% |
| Max drawdown | -27.86% | -6.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HISF and LMBS
Explore further