Screener
HQGO vs GQQQ
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
Key differences
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; GQQQ uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | GQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $130M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.45% | 15.78% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -22.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and GQQQ
Explore further