Screener
HQGO vs ROE
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.15% less per year.
- ROE is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; ROE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $239M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.45% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and ROE
Explore further