Screener
HQGO vs HAPS
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.27% less per year.
- HAPS is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | HAPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $157M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 17.11% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -27.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and HAPS
Explore further