Screener
HQGO vs IUSG
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.30% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +34.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 15.81% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -32.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and IUSG
Explore further