Screener
HQGO vs TCHP
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.23% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.45% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and TCHP
Explore further