Screener
HQGO vs TGRW
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.18% less per year.
- TGRW is significantly larger than HQGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HQGO follows a index tracking strategy; TGRW uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HQGO | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $972M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 16.62% |
| Max drawdown | -20.85% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HQGO and TGRW
Explore further