Screener
HSCZ vs EFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than HSCZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HSCZ covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, HSCZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HSCZ | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2015 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.28% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -34.89% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HSCZ and EFA
Explore further