Screener
HTEC vs BMED
Robo Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF vs iShares Health Innovation Active ETF
Key differences
- BMED costs 0.13% less per year.
- HTEC is significantly larger than BMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HTEC follows a index tracking strategy; BMED uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HTEC | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $53M | $10M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.2% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.27% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -57.53% | -36.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HTEC and BMED
Explore further